Critical illness insurance is suffering from a lot of negative publicity at the moment. This article discusses why.

Critical illness insurance - every detail counts  

critical illness insurance, you probably wont be expecting to be asked a long list of questions from the insurer. According to a number of newspaper articles, claimants are facing an insensitive attitude and sometimes non-cooperation from the insurers in question. In this article, we find out why.

Obviously, the insurer does not want to pay out without good reason. Claims are usually over £100,000, which can be considerably more than other types of insurance. Once you make a claim, they will look at your medical records in extreme detail to ensure that everything youve mentioned on your application matches the truth. Every little visit to the doctor will be examined in detail. Unfortunately for the claimants, this kind of delay can be very upsetting at a very difficult time. (medical insurance)

The insurers say that they are well within their rights to check ( unsecured loans ) out all these details. They say that they have to be sure that their customers are not cheating them, because if they find that you omitted some details on application form, your claim will be made invalid. This is known as non-disclosure, and even if the information that you failed to provide has nothing to do with the illness, in the event of a claim the insurer would say that the premium you paid was different because of the omission. Your claim would therefore be invalid.

People that make a claim within the first five years of a policy are treated with the most distrust. This is known as an early claim, and the insurer will be looking out for evidence that the claimant suspected that they were suffering from an illness when they took out the critical illness insurance policy.

All this wrangling has attracted negative publicity because it is causing lots of extra pain and worry for people who are already ill and distressed. We think ( mortgages ) that insurance companies need to soften their approach at this difficult time, and deal with people on a more personal basis if they want to lessen this publicity. (pet insurance)

It would also seem that, as a result of this adverse publicity, new applicants are choosing to take out their policies with insurers who have published the lowest rejection rates. Companies that are known to put up a ( personal loans ) fuss in the event of a claim are experiencing lower levels of applicants.

However, we dont think that avoiding the insurers who have the highest refusal ( medical insurance ) rates is any great help. The figures that are published do not give the full picture. Scottish Equitable Protect recently published figures showing that they only paid out on 72% of claims, Friends Provident only paid out on 75% of claims. Scottish Provident paid out on 86.3% of claims, so we can expect applicants to favour them, but that shouldnt necessarily be the case.

We say this because the figures depend on how long the insurer has been operating critical illness insurance. Rejection rates will be highest with the companies that have only been running critical illness policies for a short time, so therefore the figures are misleading. As a result, Guardian Financial Services, for example, looks like one of the best because it pays out on 90% of claims. However, they have been in the business for over 15 years, and have had time to absorb peaks and troughs. (medical insurance)

Click here for page 2